High CourtsDivision Bench(1907) 03 BOM CK 0005

Bai Shri Vaktuba vs Agarsangji Raisungji

Bombay High Court · Decided on 21 March 1907 · Citation: (1907) 9 BOMLR 547

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, J · Beaman, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Application No. 303 of 1906

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 88 words

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.—It is clear that in this case the Court acted u/s 206 of the CPC and only under that section.

2.

The decisions in Calcutta and Allahabad establish that the proceedings u/s 206 terminate in an order.

3.

We are, therefore, able to deal with the matter and we have no doubt that the learned Judges who granted the rule were right in their view that this order was beyond the jurisdiction conferred by Section 206.

4.

We therefore make the rule absolute with costs throughout.