High CourtsFull Bench(1908) 02 BOM CK 0006

Bai Diwali vs Girdhar Govindram Patel

Bombay High Court · Decided on 28 February 1908 · Citation: (1908) 10 BOMLR 577

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.C.I.E., C.J · Lawrence Jenkins, J · Batchelor, J
CASE NUMBER
Second Appeal No. 685 of 1907

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

The decision of the District Court proceeds on the assumption that the doctrine of res judicata has some application to the case. But that is not so.

2.

Section 13 of the CPC from its very terms cannot apply, and though that section is not exhaustive the rule on which it is founded can have no application here, because Section 20 of the Dekkhan Agriculturists'' Relief Act contemplates that even when a decree has been passed which does not allow of instalments, the Court shall have power to allow instalments in execution.

3.

The order must be set aside and the case must go back for disposal by the learned Judge who must consider whether apart from the ground on which he has proceeded, the instalment should or should not be granted.

4.

Costs of this appeal will abide the result.