High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 10 SHI CK 0036

Babu Ram vs Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation And Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 5 October 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Execution Petition (T) No. 402 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 289 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

By way of instant petition filed under Rule 16(1) HP High Court Writ Rules, prayer has been made for the execution of order dated 26.9.2018 passed by erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 5788 of 2018 titled Babu Ram vs. Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another, whereby learned Tribunal, having taken note of the statement made by learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that his case is squarely covered by judgment dated 17.7.2014 rendered by this Court in CWP No. 3050/2014, Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, disposed of the Original Application with a direction to the respondents to extend benefit of aforesaid judgment to the petitioner within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of order, subject to his being similarly situate person. Since no action came to be taken in the matter after lapse of considerable period, petitioner has filed the instant petition for execution of order in question.

2.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe that the order in question stands implemented, but if not, same would be complied with, within a period of two weeks.

3.

Consequently, in view of the fair stand taken by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of order in question, within two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate steps towards execution of the order in question are taken. Petition stands disposed of in above terms.