High CourtsSingle Bench(1995) 07 MAD CK 0083

Babu vs The Inspector of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 July 1995 · Citation: (1995) 2 CTC 67

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shivappa, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal O.P. No. 4492 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 382 words

Shivappa, J.—Heard: Normally I decline to grant bail wherever the persons are arrayed as accused persons for an offence u/s 376 IPC. But this case has a special feature and I have to make departure in my view. The facts are as follows : The petitioner is arrayed as an accused for an offence Under Sections 376 and 511 of IPC in crime No. 351 of 1995 on the file of Poonamallee Police Station. The grievance of the petitioner is that the alleged victim is aged about 55 and she is a tenant and the petitioner''s relatives being the landlord had already initiated proceedings against the victim to vacate the premises. Since the petitioner asked the complainant to vacate the premises, she has filed the false complaint.

2.

According to the prosecution, the incident took place on 9.6.1995 at 20.30 hours. The petitioner was arrested on 10.6.1995. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the victim was not subjected to any medical examination and no complaint was filed by the victim and not even Section 161 statement was recorded by the police. The case diary was summoned and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that except the F.I.R. which was given by one person who is not concerned with the victim there is no other record. In the background of this case, when the victim never complained and she was not subjected to medical examination and inaction on the part of the police, keeping in view the age of the victim and other surrounding circumstances, I am of the view that liberty of the petitioner should not be deprived of and he is entitled for bail.

3.

Petitioners shall be enlarged on bail, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 3000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Poonamallee, subject to the following conditions:

a) Petitioner shall report before the respondent every day between 4.00 and 6.00 pm :

b) Petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required : and

c) Petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation and tamper the witnesses:

Breach of any one of the conditions will entitle the prosecution to move this court for cancellation of bail granted.