High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 06 GAU CK 0136

Babita Sharma Goyal vs State Of Assam And 4 Ors

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 23 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J · Manash Ranjan Pathak, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Public Interest Litigation No. 36 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

81 paragraphs · 1,489 words

The matter is taken up through video conferencing.

Heard Mrs. B.S. Goyal, the petitioner in person and Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and

Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing for the respondent No.5.

This Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the petitioner, who is a practicing lawyer before this Court. Her argument is that in the present

COVID-19 pandemic, the frontline workers, particularly, the doctors and the paramedics are not being provided with a proper Personal Protective

Equipment (PPE) kits. According to the petitioner, the PPE Kit which is presently being provided to doctors and paramedics is non-porous and it does

not allow air to pass in and out and it causes much discomfort to the doctors while examining the patients. In order to ease out this difficulty, the

petitioner has filed the present petition stating that now another PPE Kit is available in the market which has got “Air Purifying Respiratory

Devicesâ€. The petitioner has also done some research on this aspect and in Paragraph 6 of her petition, she has named five companies who either

manufacture or deal with such equipments and the prices range from Rs.10,800/- to Rs.1,19,400/- per piece of these PPE kits. The petitioner then

makes a very strange request in the same paragraph of the petition (Paragraph

6) where she has offered a cheque of Rs.1,18,000/- to the Government to purchase at least ten such PPE kits on experimental basis. Her prayers in

the petition are as follows:-

“In the premises aforesaid, it is humble prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to call for the records, issue Notice

calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate Writ, Order or

Direction be not issued directing the Respondents to provide PPE kits/suits powered by air purifying respiratory devices to the Corona

Warriors so as to ensure minimum human working conditions to the doctors, health workers and any other paramedical staffs associated

with Covid related duties and on cause or causes shown and after hearing the parties make the Rule absolute and/or pass such further or

other Order or Orders as to this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

-and-

In the interim be further pleased to pass such appropriate Order, Directions that this Hon’ble Court may deem proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case.â€​

During this COVID-19 pandemic, this Court has been dealing with a number of PILs, which have focused on various aspects of the present

pandemic, such as, the condition of sex workers where they are not getting even their daily ration, conditions of the marginalized workers, even the

plight of doctors, who at least in one case was manhandled.

This Court has taken cognizance in all such PILs and at different stages directions have been given in these PILs.

A genuine and bonafide PIL must be encouraged by all Courts but at the same time, a frivolous PIL which is being filed for extraneous reasons must

be discouraged. This has been the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in its seminal judgment, i.e. State of Uttaranchal -Vs- Balwant

Singh Chaufal & Ors. reported in (2010) 3 SCC 402, wherein it gave certain guidelines, which are as follows:-

“(1) The Courts must encourage genuine and bona fide PIL and effectively discourage and curb the PIL filed for extraneous

considerations.

(2) Instead of every individual Judge devising his own procedure for dealing with the public interest litigation, it would be appropriate for

each High Court to properly formulate rules for encouraging the genuine PIL and discouraging the PIL filed with oblique motives.

Consequently, we request that the High Courts who have not yet framed the rules, should frame the rules within three months. The Registrar

General of each High Court is directed to ensure that a copy of the rules prepared by the High Court is sent to the Secretary General of this

Court immediately thereafter.

(3) The Courts should prima facie verify the credentials of the petitioner before entertaining a PIL.

(4) The Courts should be prima facie satisfied regarding the correctness of the contents of the petition before entertaining a PIL.

(5) The Courts should be fully satisfied that substantial public interest is involved before entertaining the petition.

(6) The Courts should ensure that the petition which involves larger public interest, gravity and urgency must be given priority over other

petitions.

(7) The Courts before entertaining the PIL should ensure that the PIL is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury. The

Court should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the public interest litigation.

(8) The Courts should also ensure that the petitions filed by busybodies for extraneous and ulterior motives must be discouraged by

imposing exemplary costs or by adopting similar novel methods to curb frivolous petitions and the petitions filed for extraneous

considerations.â€​

Before us, neither a doctor nor a paramedic has come up with a grievance that the present PPE kits are need to be changed. The petitioner is not a

doctor or paramedic. Moreover, her claim does not rest on any verifiable data. The prayer for a direction from this Court for purchase of a particular

kind of PPE kit is a matter which cannot be considered by a Court in a PIL. As if this was not enough, the petitioner has also offered a cheque of

Rs.1,18,000/- to the Government through this Court, for the purchase of these “special†PPE kits. This is an absolutely strange prayer. She is

indirectly asking the Court to order the State for purchasing PPE kits of a particular company, i.e. BHT Technologies LLP. This is evident from her

averments in paragraph 6 of the petition which is being reproduced here under:

“6. That from the researches made such PPE kits is marketed by few Companies/firms in India and from the information available in the

website the price range of PPE kits/suits powered with the air purifying respiratory devices ranges from about Rs.10,800/- to Rs.1,19,400/-

(approximate prices including/excluding Taxes) and so on. The minimum price range of a full protective suit that the petitioner could find

was Rs.22,700/- fitted with the Air Purifying Respiratory device. The normal disposal PPE Kit with 90 gsm and laminated finish customized

to fix the air purifying respiratory device would cost around Rs.400/- to Rs.500/- giving a full body coverage and perhaps in case of bulk

purchase the price is likely to be much lower. The prices of some of the dealers of PPE Kits powered with the air purifying respiratory

device as found in the website are as bellow:-

i) BHT Technologies LLP ............................. Rs.10,800/-

ii) Cole Parmer ....................................... Rs.22,700/-

iii) Upper Ultraflo..................................... Rs.26,776/-

iv) Salvo ............................................... Rs.67,200/-

v) Ubuy ................................................ Rs.1,19,412/-

As the petitioner was interested to make her own small contribution and had made an effort to procure online few such PPE Kits/suits

powered with air purifying respiratory device so that it could be donated to the Health Department of the Government of Assam. To make an

endeavour, the petitioner found that for a full protective Suit powered with the Air Purifying Respiratory device, the lowest price was that of

BHT Technologies LLP, hence the petitioner sent a query for purchase of 5 nos. of the PPE Kits/ Suits in response to the said query, BHT

Technologies LLP sent a proforma invoice quoting the rate @ Rs.10,800 for each PPE Kits/suit but for a quantity of 2000 pcs. Since the

petitioner cannot afford to purchase in such bulk and besides such goods are not available to individual buyers not related to Medical

Services, the petitioner has approached this Hon’ble Court with his PIL praying for intervention and appropriate relief. As a very

humble contribution the petitioner begs to offer a cheque of Rs.1,18,000/- to cover the cost of 10 pcs. of the PPE Kits/suits inclusive of the

GST.

The petitioner begs to state that the corona warriors who are battling the war against the virus as soldiers in the frontline while many of us

are able to keep ourselves safe staying at home, the least we can think and do for our corona warriors is to ask the Government and the

concerned authorities to provide such PPE kits/suits powered with air purifying respiratory devices so as to provide our Corona Warriors

some relief so as to be able to breathe while they are battling the war to save people.â€​

(emphasis provided)

We are afraid that this PIL must be dismissed in limine. In order to discourage filing of such PIL, we also impose a cost of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

Thousand) on the petitioner, which shall be deposited in the Registry within a period of one week, and be then transferred to the account of

Advocate/Lawyers Fund.