High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 02 KAR CK 0019

B. Adishekara Reddy vs Ravi Ankindeedu Prasad Rao & Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 4 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Aradhe, J · M.G.S. Kamal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 37689 Of 2017 (GM-RES)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 175 words

Alok Aradhe, J

1.

Mr.Santosh S.Gogi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 11.08.2017 by which the

Arbitrator, in the course of proceeding, had directed both the parties to file memo setting out the approximate value of the property in respect of which

claim was made and on that basis, to pay their respective share of the arbitration fee by the next date of hearing.

2.

Admittedly, in compliance of the aforesaid order, the petitioner has furnished the valuation and the fee payable to the Arbitrator was calculated and

the same has been paid to the Arbitrator. It is also not in dispute that the arbitration proceedings have concluded and an award has been passed on

17.05.2018.

Therefore, by efflux of time, the issue involved in the writ petition has been rendered academic. However, the issue involved in this petition is kept

open to be agitated in an appropriate case.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.