High CourtsDivision Bench(1918) 08 CAL CK 0042

Azem Ali vs Emperor

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 August 1918 · Citation: 48 Ind. Cas. 687a

HON’BLE JUDGES
Teunon, J · Cuming, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 78 words
1.

This Rule is based upon an application for transfer. Even if it had to be held that the Magistrate took cognizance under the provisions of Section 190(1)(c), Criminal Procedure Code, still that is no bar to the Magistrate holding an enquiry preliminary to commitment. We have read the Magistrate's explanation and we can find no reason to think that the petitioner will not be accorded a full and fair hearing before that officer. This Rule is discharged.