High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 02 UK CK 1025

Azad vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 February 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 146 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 195 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 09 of 2025, under Section 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”), Police Station Shyampur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 11.01.2025, 167 gram smack was allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant.

4.

It is the case of the applicant that he has been falsely implicated; there has been non compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Act; allegedly recovered quantity is less than commercial; the applicant is not a previous convict.

5.

Learned State counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.