High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 04 AHC CK 0035

Ayodhya Prasad vs Public Service Commission and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 18 April 2002 · Citation: (2002) 3 AWC 2468

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rakesh Tiwari, J · M. Katju, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 30049 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 215 words

M. Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ.—This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the U. P. Public Service Commission to call the petitioner for interview for the Post of Lecturer. The Commission advertised the post by means of Advertisement dated 21.12.1998. The petilioner applied for the post and appeared in the main examination in the year 1999 but was not called for interview.

2.

Aggrieved petitioner has filed this petition.

3.

A counter-affidavit has been filed by the Commission. In paragraph 4 of the same, it is stated that petitioner was ineligible as he was only part-Lime Lecturer. The teaching experience certificates of the petitioner was checked and it was found that he was only teaching as part-time Lecturer.

4.

In Tulsi Ram v. State of U. P. 1998 (3) AWC 2165 (NOC) : 1998 (3) ESC 1617, it has been held in paragraph 36 that teaching experience of part-time teachers cannot make them eligible for appointment.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the Supreme Court decision in Dr. Asim Kumar Bose Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others,

6.

This was not a case of Lecturer of an Intermediate College and hence it is distinguishable.

7.

Following the decision in Tulsi Ram''s case (supra) this writ petition is dismissed.