High Courts(1920) 07 CAL CK 0012

Ayemuddin Bewa vs Asimuddin Pramanik

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 July 1920

CASE NUMBER
Rule No. 316 of 1920

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 124 words

Shamsul Huda, J.—I think this rule must he made absolute. The facts stated by the Petitioner in paras. 3 to 6 of his petition are not denied by the learned Subordinate Judge and some of them are clearly admitted. The procedure adopted by the learned Subordinate Judge was very irregular and I think it necessary to direct a proper trial of the case. The decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge is set aside and the case is transferred to the file of the Munsif, first Court at Bogra, for a trial de novo.

2.

As I am not satisfied that the procedure adopted by the Small Cause Court Judge was objected to by the Plaintiff I allow him no costs in this Rule.