Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 11 NCLT CK 0007

Autonix Lighting Industries Private Limited And Anr vs Moser Baer Electronics Limited And Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 19 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Deepti Mukesh, J · Sumita Purkayastha, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Interlocutory Application No. 412 Of 2020 In Company Petition No. (IB)-1265(ND) Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

52 paragraphs · 1,026 words

Sumita Purkayastha (Technical)

1.

This Application has been filed by Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, Authorized representative on behalf of 52 (fifty-two) Ex- Employees of MOSER BAER

ELECTRONICS LTD. seeking directions to release the lawful dues of the ex-employees who had submitted their resignation prior to the initiation of

the CIRP process. The application has been filed by seeking the following prayers:-

a) Admit and Allow this Application. Issue necessary directions to the RP to release the DUES of the ex-employees as per the commitment.

b) Issue necessary directions to the RP to deposit the Provident Fund with EPFO and release Gratuity dues with the forthwith.

c) Issue necessary directions to the erstwhile management of the Corporate Debtor to remit the requisite funds to the RP for disbursal of dues of the

present applicant.

d) Pass any further or suitable orders as may be necessary and expedient in the facts of this case.

2.

The facts of the case in brief are that the Corporate Debtor is a wholly owned subsidiary of MOSERBAER INDIA LIMITED. As per the

averments made in the application it is stated that all the Employees were forced to resign by the ex-management by March 2019. Their dues (salary

and leave encashment), Provident Fund Gratuity and bonus is yet to be paid. The dues were not settled by the ex-management of the Corporate

Debtor citing financial instability.

3.

An application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was preferred by Autonix Lightning Private Limited, herein the Operational Creditor in

the matter of Moser Baer Electronic Limited, herein the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the IBC on account of default. The Adjudicating

Authority vide order dated 17.09.2019 admitted the said application and appointed Mr. Hemant Sharma as the Interim Resolution Professional of the

Corporate Debtor.

4.

As per the Public announcement made by the IRP, all the Creditors were called to submit their claims via electronic mode and every ex-employee

of the Corporate Debtor had submitted Form D with the Resolution Professional which included the pre- CIRP dues of the Ex-Employees from the

date of non-payment of salaries till their dates of resignation/relieving respectively. It also includes the Provident Fund from FY 2018-2019 till the

respective dates of resignation. The Resolution Professional admitted the amounts, but deducted Leave Encashment and bonus.

5.

As per the averments made in the application it has been stated that nine employees (applicants) were made to resign from MOSERBAER INDIA

LIMITED post its CIRP and were re-employed under contractual post in MOSER BAER ELECTRONICS LTD. that all the nine people have been

paid gratuity as and when they had resigned from their services in MOSERBAER INDIA LIMITED.

6.

The Applicant states that the Corporate debtor did not deposit Provident Fund till their dates of resignation respectively. The salary slips of the ex-

employees show that Provident Fund was deducted every month but admittedly it was not deposited with the EPSO.

7.

The applicant has relied on the Judgement dated 19.03.2019 of the Hon`ble Principal Bench in CA(PB) No. 19.(PB)/2019 filed by the Moser Baer

Karamchari Union of the MOSERBAER INDIA LIMITED (Holding Company) against the Resolution Professional in CP. NO.(IB) 378(PB)/2017

Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Vs. Moser Baer India Limited for release of their dues. The Adjudicating Authority has observed in Para 3

that “There is a basic flaw in the reasoning adopted by the liquidator. Under Section 36(41 (a) (m). the expression liquidation estate' has

been defined and it is clarified that all sums due to any workman or employee from the provident fund, pension fund and gratuity fund,

were not to constitute and included in the expression 'liquidation estate assets"". Once the sum due to any workman or employee from the

provident fund, pension fund and gratuity fund are not constitute a part of the liquidation estate. we fail to understand as to how Section 53

could be invoked along with its explanation. According to Section 53. the proceeds from the sale of the liquidation assets are to be

distributed in the manner specified therein. Therefore, the aforesaid amount of the workmen dues cannot be a part of liquidation estate

assets.â€​

Para 4 “The provident fund dues, pension funds dues and gratuity fund dues are not treated as a part of the liquidation estate and

would not, therefore, be recovered by Section 53 of the Code which provides for waterfall mechanism. The liquidator has taken a perverse

view by unnecessarily referring to explanation n of Section 53 and Section 326 of the Companies Act, 2013.â€​

8.

It has been observed that the order dated 19.03.2019 of the Adjudicating Authority had been challenged before the Hon`ble Appellate Authority.

The Hon`ble Appellate Authority vide its order dated 19.08.2019 upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority and stated that “ Para 24- Once

the liquidation estate/asset of the Corporate Debtor under Section 36(1) read with Section 36(3), do not include all sum due to any

workman and employees from the provident fund, the pension fund and the gratuity fund, for the purpose of distribution of assets under

Section 53, the provident fund, the pension fund and the gratuity fund cannot be included.

Para 25- The Adjudicating Authority having come to such finding that the aforesaid funds i.e., the provident fund, the pension fund and the

gratuity fund do not come within the meaning of liquidation estate' for the purpose of distribution of assets under Section 53. we find no

ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 19th March, 2019.â€​

9.

We would like to fall in line with the ratio laid down by the Hon`ble Principal Bench wherein it is clearly held that any shortfall in gratuity has to be

made over by the Resolution Professional and payments of the dues has to be paid outside the waterfall mechanism. The said finding is also uphel by

the Hon1ble NCLAT, therefore we hereby allow this IA No. 12/2020 in Company Petition No. (IB)-1265(ND)/2019. It is directed to the Resolution

Professional to release the dues of the ex-employees and deposit the Provident Fund with EPFO and release Gratuity dues with the forthwith.

10.

Copy of this order be sent to the parties.