High CourtsDivision Bench(2019) 02 P&H CK 0150

Attar Singh & Others vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 February 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. B. Chaudhari, J · Anupinder Singh Grewal, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 4214 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 360 words

A. B. Chaudhari, J

Rule.

Mrs. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG Haryana waived service on behalf of the State.

Heard forthwith with consent of counsel for the rival parties.

The present petition is directed against show cause notice dated 29.01.2019 (Annexure P-11), issued by Additional Director Administration, Directorate of Elementary Education, Haryana, Panchkula-respondent No.2. The last part of the said show cause notice reads as under:

"In view of the above explained position it has been found that you have been found ineligible as per Service Rules, 2012 and it has been decided to issue Show Cause Notice to you as to why you should not be reverted back to your original post. If you want to submit your reply / representation to this Show Cause Notice, the same should be submitted within 15 days to from the receipt of the Show Cause Notice the undersigned, otherwise it shall be presumed that you have nothing to say in your favour against the action of the Department.

No further opportunity would be granted and necessary action would be taken accordingly. Final order of reversion will be passed accordingly."

From the above, it is clear that the petitioners have been asked to file reply to the show cause notice as there is proposal to revert the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners have been found ineligible for promotion.

It is not in dispute that the petitioners were promoted to the post in question in the year 2013 and have been working since then as such. It is also not in dispute that the petitioners have filed the replies to the said show cause notice.

In view of the above circumstances we think the following order would subserve the ends of justice:

ORDER

(i) CWP No.4214 of 2019 is disposed of.

(ii) Respondent No.2 is entitled to decide the show cause notice, in accordance with law, after considering the explanation furnished by the petitioners and if respondent No.2 makes an order, adverse to the interest of the petitioners, the said adverse order shall not come into effect for a period of four weeks from the date of service of order on the individual petitioners.