AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 114 words
1.
No doubt the decree does not contain any direction for sale. But subsequent to the passing of the decree, there were applications by the
decree-holder for sale in execution of the decree, and in spite of the defendant''s objections, sale was ordered, the decree having been construed
as allowing a sale.
2.
The orders so construing the decree estop the respondent from raising any contention inconsistent with those orders at has been repeatedly laid
down.
3.
We, therefore, set aside the order of the lower Court and direct that the application be replaced on the file and proceeded with in accordance
with law. The respondent will pay the appellant''s costs in this Court.