High CourtsSingle Bench(1992) 04 MAD CK 0019

Athiammal and Another vs Kadhar Sheriff and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 April 1992 · Citation: (1993) 1 ACC 72 : (1992) 2 LW 493

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ratnam, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 187 words

Ratnam, J.—The view taken by the Tribunal regarding the liability of the Insurance Company cannot be sustained in view of the decision of

the Supreme Court reported in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Dayal 190 (2) CriLJ 135 It is seen from that decision that though the policy

may be taken during any part of the day, the policy becomes effective and operative from the commencement of that day. In that view, the Tribunal

fell into an error in passing an interim award only against the appellants herein. The award so passed cannot, therefore, be sustained. However, it is

really unnecessary to pass any interim award against the fifth respondent Insurance Company at this stage, as it is not disputed that the main

M.C.O.P. No. 12 of 1987 is still pending adjudication. The Tribunal is, therefore, directed to take up that claim petition and dispose it of

expeditiously, on or before 30.9.1992 and report such disposal to this Court, as the accident had taken place as far back as 20.10.1986. The

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is, therefore, allowed. There will be no order as to costs.