High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 KL CK 0082

ASOKAKUMAR vs THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 16 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shaji P.Chaly
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
3598 of 2017 (Y)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 211 words
1.

As per Ext.P1 dated 27.03.2013, petitioner undertook

the maintenance work of Krishi Bhavan, Ulloor. Petitioner

completed the foundation work under the supervision of the

2nd respondent and purchased materials for the work.

However, the work could not be proceeded due to the

obstruction created consequent to the standing of a Mango

tree at work site. According to the petitioner, respondents

did not take any steps to cut and remove the tree.

Therefore, petitioner can continue the rest of the work only

at the revised rates. It is also stated that an amount of

Rs.1,20,000/- is already incurred to the petitioner. In

order to resolve the controversy, petitioner has submitted

Ext.P4 representation before the 1st respondent, which is

also pending consideration. It is in this background seeking

appropriate directions, this writ petition is filed.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner

and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, there will

be a direction to the 1st respondent to take on board Ext.P4

application submitted by the petitioner and consider the

same, in accordance with law, after providing an

opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and attain finality to

the same, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.