High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 07 DEL CK 4247

Ashwa Ghosh vs Vizrt AG & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
FAO-IPD 5/2023 & CM 84/2023, CM 85/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 163 words
1.

This is an appeal preferred under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 against an administrative panel decision of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

2.

It is quite obvious that the appeal does not lie. Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act provides for appeal against orders passed by the Registrar under the Trade Marks Act. “Registrar” is defined in Section 2(y) as the Registrar of Trade Marks as referred to in Section 3. Section 3 envisages appointment of specific officer by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette as the Controller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, who shall be the Registrar of Trade Marks for the purposes of the Act.

3.

The impugned order is not passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks. Nor is the Administrative Panel of the WIPO the Registrar, for the purposes of Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act.

4.

The appeal is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed in limine.