High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 DEL CK 0256

Ashu Rani vs Manager, Dhanpatmal Virmani Sr. Sec. School And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1160 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 367 words

Sunil Gaur, J

1.

Petitioner had applied for the advertised post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Mathematics, but petitioner was unsuccessful and in this

petition, she assails appointment of respondent No.7, who has been selected as TGT (Mathematics) in Dhanpatmal Virmani Senior Secondary School,

Roop Nagar, Delhi. Petitioner alleges that degree of Masters in Mathematics held by seventh respondent is fabricated one and there is interpolation of

marks given in the interview to respondent No.7 and that it is so evident from consolidated list of candidates (Annexure P-2), who were called for

interview for the post in question.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is working as Guest Teacher in some other school and since seventh respondent is not

qualified, therefore, as per result of interview, petitioner is eligible to be appointed as TGT (Maths). It is submitted that petitioner had made several

Representations but to no avail and she had also sent a Legal Notice (Annexure P-10) on 1st December, 2017 to respondents but there is no response

and that verification of M.A. degree of seventh respondent is awaited.

3.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.4 to look into

petitioner’s Legal Notice (Annexure P-10) while treating it to be a Representation and to hold a proper inquiry to find out as to whether seventh

respondent is duly qualified and eligible to be appointed or not and as to how the marks in the interview given to seventh respondent are handwritten,

whereas the marks given to other candidates in Annexure P-2 are printed. Let respondent No.4 also verify as to how seventh respondent could obtain

M.A. degree in Mathematics, which is a regular course, from Kalinga University, Raipur, Chhatisgarh while she was in regular service in a MCD

school w.e.f. 16th October, 2014 to 8th May, 2015. Let a speaking order be passed on petitioner’s Legal Notice/ Representation (Annexure P-10)

within a period of twelve weeks and its fate be communicated to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedy, as

available in law.

4.

With aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of.