Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2005) 02 SC CK 0099

Ashok Nath Jha vs State of Bihar

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 14 February 2005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhan, J · A.R. Lakshmanan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 298 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 6118 of 2004)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 256 words
1.

The application for impleadment is allowed.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

The appellant is undergoing trial at Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 23 of 2003 arising out of Bachawara P.S. Case No. 34 of 1999. He filed an application that he be treated at a reputed mental hospital as well as for grant of provisional bail. A Medical Board constituted under the directions of the High Court in its report dated 14.9.2004 recommended that the appellant be referred to RINPAS Kankey Mental Hospital at Ranchi for providing him Inpatient Psychiatric (Intensive Observation) Care. The High Court, however, rejected the prayer by observing that "However, whatever treatment is available in the State of Bihar will be provided to the petitioner". The prayer for bail was rejected by the impugned order, aggrieved against which, the present appeal has been filed.

4.

A limited notice was issued by this Court on 5.1.2005 as to why the appellant cannot be referred to RINPAS, Kankey, Ranchi, as no hospital for specialised treatment to a mentally disturbed person was available in the State of Bihar.

5.

Mr. B.B. Singh, Learned counsel appearing for the State of Bihar does not object to the treatment to be provided at RINPAS, Kankey, Ranchi, as suggested by the Medical Board. Counsel for the appellant does not press for bail. Prayer for bail is declined.

6.

We direct that the appellant be referred to RINPAS, Kankey, Ranchi, as an Inpatient Psychiatric (Intensive Observation) Care for specialised treatment.

7.

The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above.