AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
O.P. Dwivedi, J.—The petitioner was arrested on 27th April, 2002 in case of FIR No. 37/2002, under Sections 302/120B/34, IPC read with Section 25/27, Arms Act, P.S. Gokalpuri, Delhi. The only allegation against him is that the one country made pistol was recovered from him at the instant of co-accused Aarif who made disclosure statement to the effect that he had taken pistol from the petitioner for committing of- . fence. Besides Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, the petitioner was roped u/s 302 with the and of 120-B/34 IPC. But there is no independence evidence to prove that the petitioner was part of the conspiracy except his own disclosure statement which is not admissible in evidence. Challan has already been filed. He is no more required for investigation. There is no evidence of motive against the appellant. Admittedly he did not participated in the commission of crime.
Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
Cri.M.M. 2741/2002 stand disposed of.
dusty.