High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 02 UK CK 0040

Ashok Chaudhary vs Uttarakhand Transport Corporation And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 3120 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 201 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner is an employee of Uttarakhand Transport Corporation. By means of this writ petition, he has sought following relief:

“i) Issue a writ, rule or direction in nature of certiorarified mandamus quashing the effect and operation of the impugned orders dated 07.10.2017,

22.07.2017 and 31. 10.2017 (as contained annexure no. 1 (colly) to this writ petition) after calling the entire record from the respondents and to direct

the respondents to release the all service benefits including pay and arrears to the petitioner, had it been the impugned orders were inexistence and

also to refix his pay with all increments and consequential benefits along with interest @ 18%, keeping in view the facts highlighted in the bod of the

writ petition.â€​

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the Competent Authority has now passed a subsequent

order against the petitioner.

3.

In view of the subsequent development, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to

file fresh writ petition for composite relief.

4.

Permission is granted.

5.

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.