High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 CHH CK 0059

Ashish Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 8 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 2830 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 391 words
1.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that while filing the charge-sheet the concerned Police has also added offence under

Sections 420 and 120B of the I.P.C. against the applicant.

2.

In view of the above, learned counsel is permitted to mention these two offences in the cause title of the bail application during the course of the

day.

3.

The applicant has preferred this application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with crime

No.20/2021 registered in Police Station Mahila Thana â€" Ambikapur Distt. Surguja C.G. for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506,

420 & 120B of the I.P.C.

4.

Case of the prosecution in brief, is that, prosecutrix is a widow lady aged about 35 years having two children and serving as a peon in the office of

PWD. In 2016, she came in contact with the present applicant through facebook thereafter they developed intimacy and the applicant started sexually

exploiting her on promise to marry. Applicant and his elder brother Adarsh Tiwari induced her to seek loan in her name for purchase of Scorpio

vehicle. Applicant has also retained her ATM card and obtained different amount from prosecutrix at different point of time.

5.

Applicant is aged about 24 years whereas prosecutrix is aged about 35 years. The offence of rape or sexual exploitation happened between 2016-

18 whereas present written complaint has been lodged on 10.3.2021. On the basis of which the FIR has been registered on 18.3.2021. Thus, there is

delay of about 3 years in lodging the FIR.

6.

Learned State counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail.

7.

Considering the enormous delay in lodging the FIR and for the fact that applicant is in jail since 19.3.2021, I am inclined to release the applicant on

bail.

8.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/-

with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given

by the said Court.

9.

Certified copy be issued to the parties only after incorporation of the newly added offences in the bail application is made.