High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 01 AHC CK 0191

Asharfi Lal Kushwaha vs Raj Bahadur and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 28 January 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Mithal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Matters Under Article 227 No. - 175 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 191 words

Pankaj Mithal, J.—In Original Suit No. 1339 of 2011 (Raj Bahadur and Others Vs. Heera Lal and Others) an ex-parte injunction was granted. Petitioner has put in appearance and filed objection but the application is not finally decided.

2.

Petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Additional Judge, Small Causes Court, Allahabad to consider and decide the temporary injunction application paper no. 6-C filed in aforesaid suit after considering the objections.

3.

Rule 3A of Order 39 CPC stipulates that where an ex-parte injunction is granted, the injunction application should be finally decided within a period of 30 days. It further provides that the court shall not only make endeavour to finally dispose of the interim injunction application within 30 days from the date on which the injunction was granted but where court is unable to do, it shall record its reason for such inability. In view of the above provision, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the court concern to follow the mandate of Rule 3A of Order 39 CPC and to ensure speedy disposal of the interim injunction application finally.