High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 11 RAJ CK 0075

Asaman S/o Omprakash vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 30 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
5739 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

47 paragraphs · 413 words
1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482

Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 246/2017 dated 14.10.2017

registered at Police Station Muhana, Jhunjhunu for the offences

under Sections 498A and 406 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry

Prevention Act .

2.

During the course of arguments, the learned counsel

for the petitioners has submitted two arguments.

3.

Firstly, it is contended that Jhunjhunu court has no

territorial jurisdiction to try the offences as aggrieved wife stayed

at Bhadara falling within District of Hanumangarh and at present

she is staying with her father at Buhana, District Jhunjhunu.

4.

Attention of the counsel for the petitioners has been

drawn to Section 181(4) Cr.P.C. whereby articles which have been

misappropriated or subjected to criminal breach of trust are

required to be returned where the complainant is staying.

Therefore, the territorial jurisdiction shall vest in the court at

Jhunjhunu. Whether Stri Dhan returned or not is a question of

fact, which can only be determined after evidence is adduced by

the parties.

5.

Secondly, the learned counsel for the petitioners has

submitted that earlier a complaint was filed by the respondent

wife within jurisdiction of Hanumangarh and in the said petition, a

compromise was effected but later protest petition was filed.

6.

In view of above, proceedings pending against the

accused in the court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhadra,

District Hanumangarh are transferred to the court of Magistrate,

Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. The proceedings arising out of both

the cases shall be tried separately and simultaneously by the court

of Judicial Magistrate, Buhana.

7.

Considering that in the earlier proceedings compromise

was effected and a protest petition is pending, personal

appearance of the accused petitioners before the trial court at

Buhana is exempted subject to following conditions:-

a) That upon appearance, accused petitioners shall furnish bail

bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Magistrate,

Buhana.

b) In case such bail bonds/surety bonds are furnished within one

month, they shall be accepted by the trial court at Buhana.

c) That the accused petitioners shall furnish an undertaking that

they shall appear before the trial court at time as and when they

are called upon to do so.

d) That in the undertaking to be filed by the accused petitioners,

they shall specifically state that the proceedings carried in their

absence but in presence of their counsel shall be binding upon

them.

8.

In view of directions issued above, the present petition

is disposed of.