High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 RAJ CK 0008

Arvind S/o Shri Kanyha Lal vs The State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 1 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
1318 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 409 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record & case diary.

2.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection

with F.I.R. No.447/2016, Police Station Kotwali, Pali for the

offences under Sections 452, 376, 383 and 342 / 34 IPC, Section

67 A, B of IT Act and Section 3(1)(R)(W)3(2)(5) of the SC/ ST Act .

3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire case as set

up by the prosecutrix in the FIR and in her statement under

Section 164 Cr.P.C. is false. The prosecutrix is a major woman who

had divorced her husband. She contracted marriage with the

petitioner voluntarily and stayed with him for a period in excess of

four months whereafter, relations fell out and the FIR came to be

lodged. He contends that the I.O. has also concluded that there

was a relationship of husband and wife between the petitioner and

the prosecutrix. He thus prays that the petitioner deserves to be

released on bail.

4.

Learned P.P. vehemently opposes the submissions advanced

by the petitioner''s counsel. However, he too is not in a position to

dispute the fact that the I.O. upon concluding investigation has

reached to the conclusion that the petitioner and the complainant

were having long standing love affairs and contracted marriage

with each other. Thereafter, they stayed in a rented house in

Indira Colony. The petitioner''s parents divested him from the

property and due to this, there was a dispute between the spouses

and relationship fell out.

5.

In view of the above conclusions of the I.O. and having

regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances as available

on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at

the Bar but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by

the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

6.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner, Arvind arrested in connection with

F.I.R. No.447/2016, Police Station Kotwali, Pali shall be released

on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and

two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court

on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.