High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 03 DEL CK 0148

Arvind Malik vs Pranita Kapoor And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 21 March 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J · Neena Bansal Krishna, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CONT.APP.(C) No. 12 Of 2023, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 13277 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 388 words
1.

Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking following reliefs:

“a.) Admit the appeal throughout and summon/call for the Court Record in C.M. (Main) No. 484/2020 titled as Parnita Kapoor and Ors. vs. Arvind Malik and Ors. and in Cont.Cas(c) 224/2021 and;

b.) To set aside and/or modify the impugned judgment/final order dt.16.03.2023 passed by HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JUDGE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER NAMELY PARNITA KAPOOR & ANR. VERSUS ARVIND MALIK BEARING CONT.CAS(C) 224/2021 and to acquit the appellant herein in view of the facts and circumstance mentioned herein above and also in the interest of the justice and also in the interest of justice.”

2.

The Court of learned Single Judge vide Judgment dated 16.03.2023 passed in CONT.CAS(C) 224/2021 titled Parnita Kapoor & Ors. vs. Arvind Malik sentenced the appellant herein to undergo six months simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo fifteen days simple imprisonment.

3.

Today, learned counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and as per the said settlement, a sum of Rs. 23,00,000/- has been paid to the respondents herein.

4.

Learned counsel on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the fact that a sum of Rs. 23,00,000/- has been paid in favour of the respondents, and the same fact has also been confirmed by the respondents who are present in the Court physically.

5.

Learned counsel on behalf of the appellant further submits that the Conviction Order/Judgment dated 16.03.2023 be modified and the appellant be released on the sentence that he has already undergone.

6.

It may be noted that as per the said settlement, wherein it has been agreed that the pending case(s) inter se the parties shall be withdrawn/settled.

7.

Accordingly, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties, we hereby, while upholding the Conviction Order/Judgment dated 16.03.2023, modify the said sentence to the extent the period already undergone by the appellant.

8.

The present appeal along with the pending application is disposed of.

9.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned jail authority, and on receipt of the same, the concerned jail authority is directed to release the appellant.