High CourtsDivision Bench(1912) 08 MAD CK 0034

Arunagiri Mudaliar vs Uthando Mudali

Madras High Court · Decided on 20 August 1912 · Citation: 17 Ind. Cas. 242

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, O.C.J. · Napier, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 145 words
1.

The application for delivery of the property was made on the 19th January 1910, i.e., after the Limitation Act of 1908 had come into force. The

sale had been confirmed on the 28th July 1906, and thereupon became absolute u/s 314 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882. It has been

contended before us that the sale did not become absolute until the final dismissal of the petition put in by a third party u/s 311 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1882, but we are unable to accept this contention. On these facts, we are of opinion that the Article of Limitation Act applicable to the

present application is Article 180 of the 2nd Schedule of the Act of 1908, the period of limitation being three years from the date when the sale

became absolute.

2.

We, therefore, dismiss this appeal with casts.