High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 RAJ CK 0109

Arjun Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 11 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 765 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 203 words

Petitioner through his natural guardian father Shri Gyanmal @ Ganmal has preferred this revision petition aggrieved by order dated 03.03.2020 passed

by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ajmer (Rajasthan) whereby the application filed by the petitioner under section 12 of the Juvenile

Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was rejected.

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a juvenile and the trial may take long time. Counsel further submits that the petitioner

has been falsely implicated in this matter. Therefore, the criminal revision may be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the revision petition.

I have considered the contentions.

The revision petition is allowed. It is directed that petitioner be released on bail, provided his natural guardian father Shri Gyanmal @ Ganmal,

furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Juvenile Justice

Board with the stipulation that he shall produce the petitioner before the concerned Juvenile Justice Board on all dates, till the enquiry or trial is

completed. His natural guardian father shall ensure that the juvenile in conflict with law, maintains good conduct and behaviour.