High Courts(1911) 04 MAD CK 0004

Arji Marappa Chetti vs Arji Shunmugappa Chetti

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 April 1911 · Citation: (1911) 21 MLJ 518

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 196 words
1.

Assuming that when the judgment-debtor sues to recover money paid in respect of what the judgment-creditor has failed to certify, limitation

begins to run against the judgment-debtor on the expiry of 90 days from the date of payment (though there appears to be no direct authority on the

point) we are not prepared to apply this period of limitation to a case where, by reason of the judgment-creditor''s failure to certify, the judgment-

debtor has been compelled to pay a third party. In the first class of cases the plaintiff sues to recover money paid on a consideration which has

failed. In the 2nd class he sues to recover damages for loss sustained by reason of the judgment-creditor having failed to discharge the duty cast

upon him by the law. We agree with Sankaran Nair J. that in the 2nd class of cases, the cause of action arises when the judgment-debtor has to

pay the second time. The case in In the matter of Medai Kalliani Annt ILR (1907) M. 545 does not touch the question of limitation. It merely

decided that the judgment-debtor has a cause of action when the judgment-creditor fails to certify.