AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 122 words
1.
We are unable to agree with the learned Judge that an appeal does not lie. The Allahabad case on which he relies was considered and dissented
from by a Bench of this Court in Venkatasami Naik v. Chinna Narayana Naik Appeal against Order No. 32 of 1894 (unreported) which,
however, does not appear to have been brought to the notice of the learned Judge.
2.
We agree with the previous ruling of this Court.
3.
On the merits, however, we find no ground for the appeal. There is no affidavit or other evidence to show that the District Judge refused to
examine any witness whom the appellant desired to examine The Vakils on both sides were heard. We dismiss the appeal