High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 09 MAD CK 0027

Arakal Bastian Ansap and Others vs Nakayana Aiyar and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 September 1910 · Citation: (1911) ILR (Mad) 405

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arnold White, C.J · Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 151 words
1.

The application for probate of the will was dismissed on the ground that the will had been revoked by marriage. The appellant does not contend that the will had not been revoked. He says the defendants had no locus standi to oppose the application for probate. They are judgment-creditors of the son of the deceased, two of whom had attached the son''s interest in his deceased father''s estate before the application for probate was made. The District Judge followed the authorities In the matter of the petition of Nilmoney Singh Umanath Mookho-padhya v. Nilmoney Singh ILR 19 (1881) Cal. 429 and Kishen Dai v. Satyendranath Dutt ILR 19 (1901) Cal. 441. In the latter case the Privy Council''s decision in Nilmoni Singh Deo v. Umanath Mookerjee ILR 19 (1884) Cal. 19 was considered. We are not prepared to say he was wrong.

2.

The appeal is dismissed with costs--two sets.