High CourtsSingle Bench(1915) 12 MAD CK 0005

A.P.T. Veerabhadra Pillai vs A.P.T. Shunmugam Pillai

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 December 1915 · Citation: 32 Ind. Cas. 668

HON’BLE JUDGES
Srinivasa Aiyangar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 202 words

Srinivasa Aiyangar, J.—The Magistrate in this case has found that as regards the villages of Sithambur and Bommanapolliem, Veerabadra

Pillai and Shanmugam Pillai, the two parties to the dispute, were jointly in possession. On that finding he was not entitled to issue any order u/s 145

of the Criminal Procedure Code, directing either the one party or the other, from disturbing the possession of the other till evicted in due course of

law. It was so held in Tarujan Bibee v. Asamuddi Bepari 4 C.W.N. 426, and it has been followed in this Court by Mr. Justice Sadasiva Aiyar in

the case reported as Kandasami Asari v. Narayana Asari 26 Ind. Cas. 644. Unfortunately the exact order issued by the Magistrate is not before

me. If, as a matter of fact, he has issued any order with regard to these two villages, that will have to be cancelled. The remainder of the order was

within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate to pass and Mr. T.R. Ramachandra Aiyar has not convinced me that I have jurisdiction to interfere

whatever errors might have been committed by the Magistrate in arriving at the conclusion which he did. There will be no costs on either side.