High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 KL CK 0118

A.P. Mohammed Asif vs District Collector And Ors

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 8 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V. Asha, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 27361 Of 2020 (U)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 234 words
1.

The petitioner, who was a licensed authorised wholesale distributor of rationed articles from 2004 onwards till 01.11.2016, has filed this Writ Petition

challenging the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against him. It is stated that notices are issued to him under Section 34 of the Revenue

Recovery Act alleging arrears due from him towards tide-over. According to the petitioner, the Civil Supplies Department, is liable to pay rent for his

godown where he had been storing rationed articles and the Department has been using those godowns from 01.11.2016 without paying him monthly

rent. Apart from the rent for a period of 7 months, it is stated that, the Department is liable to pay the commission due to him and those amounts are

not adjusted towards the arrears demanded from him. He also objects to the amount claimed towards tide-over. It is stated that Ext.P5 objection has

already been submitted before the District Collector and that is not considered so far.

In the above circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the objection raised by the petitioner in Ext.P5 and

to pass orders on the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner through electronic media, within a period of three months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time, no further action shall be taken on the revenue recovery proceedings.