High CourtsDivision Bench(2016) 06 GAU CK 0051

Anuwar Firoz Mehdi vs Abdul Matlib

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 7 June 2016 · Citation: (2016) 5 GauLJ 270 : (2016) 5 GauLR 52

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mr. Ajit Singh, CJ. and Mr. Suman Shyam, J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
WA No. 75 of 2015 and WA No. 115 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 248 words

Mr. Ajit Singh, C.J.—Both these appeals are directed against order dated 30.3.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge of this High Court in WP(C) No. 1755/2015 whereby he has held that none of the appellants are entitled to be in-Charge Headmaster of Mowamari High School, Nagaon. It is to be noted that the learned Single Judge has also directed the Director of Secondary Education, Assam to make arrangement for appointment of some qualified person as Headmaster-in-Charge of the school in question.

2.

Rule 14 of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Service Rules, 2003 provides for recruitment to the post of Headmaster of High School. According to sub-Rule (2) the post of Headmaster is to be filled up by promotion from the school-wise seniority list on the recommendation of the State Selection Board. Sub-Rule (4) clearly provides that the minimum qualification for the post of Headmaster shall be graduate in Arts, Science or Commerce with B.T. or B.Ed. degree.

3.

Admittedly, neither Md Anuwar Firoz Mehdi (appellant in WA 75/2015) nor Abdul Matalib (appellant in WA 115/2016) possess the minimum qualification. We are, therefore, in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned Single Judge that they are not entitled to hold the post of Headmaster even as in-charge of that post. The State Government, in the interest of students, is however expected to take immediate steps for filling up the post of Headmaster by a qualified eligible person.

4.

With the above observation, the appeals are dismissed.