High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 02 DEL CK 1636

Anup Gupta vs State Nct Of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 February 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1036 Of 2026 &Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 4099 Of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 173 words

Girish Kathpalia, J

1.

Petitioner seeks to challenge order dated 09.10.2025 passed by the trial court on his application under Section 348 BNSS (Section 311 CrPC). The grievance of the petitioner is that the learned trial court has kept the application in abeyance, to be decided after examination of prosecution witnesses.

2.

Being purely a procedural order, especially keeping in mind that even according to the present petitioner, the witness sought to be summoned would be Court Witness, it is the prerogative of the trial court to decide such application at appropriate stage after satisfying itself regarding necessity of summoning such witness.

3.

Despite repeated queries learned counsel for petitioner is unable to show any law under which such procedural order can be interfered with by the High Court exercising inherent powers.

4.

The petition is completely frivolous, so dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner within one week online with www.bharatkeveer.gov.in. Accompanying application stands disposed of.

5.

Copy of this order be sent to the trial court forthwith.