Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 03 ITAT CK 3503

Anumod Sharma vs DCIT

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 11 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhumita Roy, J · Amitabh Shukla, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6319/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 193 words

PER MADHUMITA ROYA, JM:

The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10.01.2024 of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Delhi-26 [hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the assessment order dated 24.12.2019 passed by the ACIT, Central Circle-16, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ld. AO’) under Section 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2017-18.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of call. It further appears from the record that on previous two occasions the assessee was never represented. Thus, having no other alternative, we have proceeded to deal with the matter after hearing the Ld. DR and perusing the material available on record.. We find that the appeal is barred by limitation by 554 days in support of which no application for condonation of delay has been filed by the assessee on record. Having regard to this particular aspect of the matter, we dismiss this appeal as barred by limitation.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.