High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 DEL CK 0376

Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 4254 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 457 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.30533/2018 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 4254/2018

1.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 1386 of 2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar,

Delhi based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner prays for exemption from personal appearance on behalf of petitioner no. 2 and 3 on the ground that they are aged

and permanent residents of Jamshedpur. They have filed their affidavits in support of petition. In view of the above, petitioner no. 2 and 3 are granted

exemption from personal appearance.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement before Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre on

03.02.2018.

4.

As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 75,00,000/- has been agreed to be paid to respondent no. 2. A sum of Rs. 35,00,000/- has already been

paid and the balance sum of Rs. 40,00,000/- has been paid, today in Court, by way DD No. 383875 dated 21.08.2018 issued by Yes Bank to

respondent No. 2, who is present in Court in person.

5.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and the parties have already been divorced by decree of divorce

dated 05.01.2014.

6.

As per the settlement the minor child shall remain in the permanent custody of respondent No.2. The petitioner No. 1 who is present in Court

undertake that he shall not claim any rights contrary to the settlement terms. The undertaking is accepted.

7.

Respondent no. 2 is present in court in person, represented by counsel and is identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has settled the

dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

8.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled,

continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end

and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the

consequent proceedings emanating there from.

9.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 1386 of 2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok

Nagar, Delhi, and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are, accordingly quashed.

10.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.