Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 10 ITAT CK 2675

Anubha Bansal vs ACIT

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 13 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member · Manish Agarwal, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 2640/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 141 words

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2015-16, arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1074272588(1) dated 10.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) o f the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

Coming to the assessee’s sole substantive ground pleaded in the instant appeal challe nging bo th the learned lower authorities’ action imposing section 271(1)(c) penalty of Rs.76 ,80,559/-, it transpires at the outset that the tribunal’s order in her quantum appeal ITA No . 2314/Del/2019 dated 19.09.2025 has already deleted the corresponding quantum addition; and, therefore, it is concluded that the impugned penalty has no legs to stand be ing consequential in nature. The same is directed to be deleted in very terms.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.