High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 CAL CK 0061

Antim Roy & Ors. vs State Of West Bengal & Ors

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 17 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amrita Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 8613 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

60 paragraphs · 1,130 words

Affidavit-in-opposition filed by the University and the reply thereto by the petitioner filed in Court today are taken on record.

The writ petition has been filed by seventeen students/petitioners by putting in only one Court fees.

The learned advocate-on-record of the petitioners is given liberty to deposit the deficit Court fees in course of the day. In the event, deficit Court fees

are not paid by today, the order passed herein shall be restricted in respect of the petitioner No.1 and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been

dismissed in respect of the rest.

The petitioners took admission in the four years’ integrated B.A. B.Ed/B.Sc. B.Ed Course in the Prabhat Jyotirmoyee Educational Research

Institute, Suri, Birbhum, a college affiliated to the University of Burdwan.

According to the admission regulations of the University of Burdwan, admission in the colleges are to be made only in the online mode.

In the instant case, the petitioners got themselves admitted in the offline mode.

Pursuant to the notice of the University of Burdwan dated September 15, 2020 to all the Principals of the Colleges teaching four-years’ integrated

B.A./B.Sc. B.Ed course, 2019-2023 session the college forwarded the documents of the petitioners and all other students to the University and

Registration Certificate was duly issued in their favour. The examination schedule of the first and second semester examinations was published in

March 2021. The admit cards of the petitioners were not supplied to them allegedly on the ground that they took admission offline.

The petitioners approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition and by order dated March 26, 2021 the Court permitted the petitioners to

participate in the online examination and the answer-scripts were directed to be kept in the custody of the University till the disposal of the writ

petition.

By further order dated July 13, 2021 the Court directed that the University may proceed to evaluate the answer-scripts of the students if there is no

legal bar in doing so.

It has been submitted in Court that the result of the first and second semester examinations have not been published till date.

The examination schedule for the third and fourth semester examinations has been published by the University. The dates for filling up the forms are

August 18, 2021 to August 19, 2021. The petitioners apprehend that they will not be permitted to fill in the forms for appearing in the third and forth

semester examinations.

The learned advocate representing the University strenuously contends before the Court that the admission procedure of the University clearly lays

down that the admission has to be done online. The college ought to have followed the procedure laid down by the affiliating University and should not

have permitted the students to take admission offline.

It has been submitted that the Registration Certificates were issued to the petitioners by mistake and it is open for the University to rectify the said

mistake. The learned advocate relies upon several decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on this settled proposition of law.

The University further submits that if any order is passed in favour of the petitioners herein, the same will set up a precedent and the colleges will find

out means to admit the students in the offline mode by not following the regulations of the University.

The learned advocate appearing for the college submits that as 2019 was the first year when affiliation was granted to the college by the University,

accordingly, there was some delay in admitting the students.

It has further been submitted that there are hundred seats to be filled up and only fourteen students were initially admitted in the online mode. As there

were enough vacancies to be filled up and the students had the eligibility criteria for admission, accordingly, the college permitted the students to be

admitted offline.

It has been submitted that the college duly forwarded all the documents of the petitioners to the University and after scrutinizing all the documents the

University issued the Registration Certificates to the candidates.

The petitioners rely upon an unreported order dated August 3, 2021 passed by this Court in WPA No. 8836 of 2021 (Priyanka Kumari & Anr. vs. The

State of West Bengal & Ors.). In the said matter the Court directed the University of Burdwan to take necessary steps to consider the prayer of the

petitioners for regularization of their admission and for grant of Registration Certificate in their favour.

Liberty was given to the University to take steps against the erring college for not following their rules and regulations relating to admission of

students.

The Court further directed that the order shall not be treated as a precedent by the college for taking admission of students in future contrary to the

rules and regulations fixed by the affiliating University.

In Priyanka Kumari (supra) the students were admitted offline by the self-financed B.Ed college. In the present case also the petitioners have been

admitted offline by the self-financed college. In the earlier writ petition the University did not issue the Registration Certificates as the candidates

were admitted offline. In the instant case though the candidates were admitted offline the University issued Registration Certificate in their favour.

The petitioners herein possess the minimum eligibility criteria for admission and Registration Certificates have already been granted in their favour by

the University. The petitioners have appeared in the semester 1 and 2 examinations. 2019 was the first year when the college got affiliation from the

University and thereafter admitted the students as there were enough number of vacancies.

Prior to taking admission of students in the offline mode the college ought to have obtained necessary permission from the University as the admission

rules of the University requires candidates to be admitted in the online mode. The college has certainly flouted the said regulation of the University.

The candidates cannot be solely faulted for taking admission in the offline mode.

However, keeping in mind that the students have spent two years by attending the classes and participating in the semester examinations and that

Registration Certificates have also been issued in their favour by the University, accordingly, the University is directed to regularize the admission of

the students and permit them to take part in the subsequent semester examinations.

The University will be at liberty to take steps against the college for not following their rules and regulations relating to admission of students.

It is made clear that this order shall not be treated as a precedent by the college for taking admission of students in future contrary to the rules and

regulations fixed by the affiliating University.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon completion of usual legal formalities.