High CourtsDivision Bench(1896) 11 MAD CK 0012

Anna Pillai vs Thangathammal

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 November 1896 · Citation: (1897) ILR (Mad) 78

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Davies, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 80 words
1.

The decree was not so formal as it should have been under the Transfer of Property Act. This is no doubt due to the fact that that Act had only

just come into force at the time when the decree was passed. The decree is in reality a decree for sale. There is nothing to show that the property

to be sold is not liable to the debt.

2.

The appeal is dismissed u/s 551, Code of Civil Procedure.