High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 04 DEL CK 0200

Ankur Sabarwal vs State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 April 2011 · Citation: (2012) 2 JCC 847

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukta Gupta, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.C. No. 1335 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 417 words

Hon''ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta

Crl. MA. No. 4959/2011 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Crl. M.C. 1335/2011 & Crl. M.A. No. 4958/2011 (Stay)

1.

This is a petition for quashing of FTR No. 221/2010 u/s 307 IPC registered at P.S. Lajpat Nagar. New Delhi on the complaint of one Bharat Bhushan Bhutani. As per the allegations set out in the complaint the Petitioner chased Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who are the mother and daughter and gave blow by a rod resulting in injuries on their heads. The Petitioner who is present in person undertakes that he will not commit any such incident in future and will not interfere in the life of Respondent No. 2 & 3 or their family members in future in any manner whatsoever. He further undertakes to adequately compensate the Respondent No. 2 and 3.

2.

Respondent No. 2 and 3 who are present in person state that since the Petitioner is not troubling them anymore and has undertaken not to trouble them in future nor interfere in their peaceful living, they do not want to pursue the present FIR as the pendency of the same would adversely affect the future life of the Respondent No. 3 and the other family members.

3.

The Complainant Bharat Bhushan is not an injured and the Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 are the injured in the present case. The Petitioner has just completed his study. However, the Respondent No. 3 is still a student and pursuing her study. The parties have amicably reserved their disputes, the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were discharged from the hospital in two days and the injury on the head was not opined to be grievous in nature.

4.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be appropriate to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

5.

Consequently, FIR No. 221/2010 u/s 307 IPC registered at P.S. Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

6.

Parties are identified by their counsels and the investigating officer. Parties have signed this order-sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti.