High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0339

Anjulata Sahu @ Anju vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Prasanna Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MCRC(A) No. 1065 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 232 words

Ram Prasanna Sharma, J

1.

Heard.

2.

This is the second bail application filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending arrest in

connection with Crime No. 175/2018, registered at Police Station Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara(CG) for the offence punishable under

Section 304-B read with Section 34 of the IPC.

3.

As per the application, earlier, due to miscommunication it was submitted before the Court that the applicant had given birth to a child, but

subsequently, it was revealed that the due date of delivery is 23.10.2018, therefore, the applicant be extended benefit of anticipatory bail in the event

of arrest.

4.

The earlier bail application was decided on merits. In the said application, it was mentioned by the applicant that she just gave birth to a child whose

age is about one month. Now it is submitted that date of delivery is 23.10.2018. The application was dismissed on 3.8.2018 and merits of the case

would not be changed in any way. Even if, the applicant surrenders before the authority concerned, medical facility shall be provided to her as per

rules.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to take a different view what is recorded in order dated 3.8.2018 by this

Court.

6.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is rejected.