High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 12 CAL CK 0013

Anju Begam And Another vs State Of West Bengal

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 6 December 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjib Banerjee, J · Suvra Ghosh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 10500 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 204 words

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Amta Police Station Case No.347 of 2018 dated August 17, 2018 under Sections 341/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 POCSO Act.

The State produces the case diary and says that the charge-sheet has been filed.

Considering the material on record and the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, there may not be any need to interrogate the petitioners.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In addition, the petitioners will attend the trial on every day that the matter is fixed and any default on the part of the petitioners will entitle the trial court to cancel the bail without reference to this court.

The petition for anticipatory bail is allowed on the conditions indicated above.

A certified copy of this order be immediately made available to the petitioners, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.