High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 04 KAR CK 0407

Anitha Xxxxxxxxxxxxx vs State Of Karnataka By Its Principal Secretary To Government Health And Family Welfare Department Vikasa Soudha, Ambedkar Veedhi Bengaluru - 560001 & Ors.

Karnataka High Court, Principal Bench · Decided on 4 April 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
S Vishwajith Shetty, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 8060 Of 2025 (GM-RES)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

35 paragraphs · 998 words

M. Nagaprasanna, J

1.

The petitioner, the wife of the convict, is at the doors of this Court seeking the following prayer:

“a. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing to the Medical Board of Victoria Hospital-Respondent No.2 to provide the Medical Report and medical Certificate of the Petitioner as per the Letter dated 17.04.2024 requested by Chief Medical Officer of Central Prisons Hospital produced at ANNEXURE– J;

b. Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2.

Heard Sri Sunil Kumar S, learned counsel appearing for petitioner, Sri V.G.Bhanuprakash, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents.

3.

In the light of the prayer so sought by the petitioner, this Court passed slew of orders. On 20.03.2025 the following order:

“The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the Medical Board, Victoria Hospital to provide the medical report and medical certificate of the petitioner and transmit it to the Chief Medical Officer of Central Prisons Hospital.

Keeping the petition pending, I direct respondent No.2 - Victoria Hospital to furnish all the medical reports of the petitioner to the Chief Medical Officer of Central Prisons Hospital, forthwith.

List this matter on 25.03.2025, in the fresh matters list.”

On 27.03.2025 the following order:

“This Court on 20.03.2025 had passed the following order:

"The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the Medical Board, Victoria Hospital to provide the medical report and medical certificate of the petitioner and transmit it to the Chief Medical Officer of Central Prisons Hospital.

Keeping the petition pending, I direct respondent No.2 - Victoria Hospital to furnish all the medical reports of the petitioner to the Chief Medical Officer of Central Prisons Hospital, forthwith.

List this matter on 25.03.2025, in the fresh matters list."

Learned HCGP submits that he has failed in his efforts to convince the Medical Superintendent of Victoria Hospital with regard to the urgency, as he is unable to understand the urgency in the matter.

Therefore, the Medical Superintendent, if he is not transmitting the records by the afternoon of 28.03.2025 at 2.30 p.m., shall be present before this Court at 3.30 p.m. on 01.04.2025 and the matter would be viewed seriously.

List this matter on 01.04.2025, in the fresh matters list.”

and on 03.04.2025 the following order:

“Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

The Medical Superintendent of the Victoria Hospital is present before the Court.

The Medical Superintendent would submit that he would make sure that the patient is suffering from the ailment that they are projecting. The petitioner would be subject to the Medical Board and the opinion of the Medical Board is placed before the Court.

Though the action of the hospital in conducting a medical test without the order from the Court or without any requisition would become contrary to law, since the patient is already been examined and the opinion of the Board in place, I deem it appropriate to direct the Medical Superintendent to transmit the opinion of the Medical Board to the Chief Medical Officer of the Central Prison, forthwith, by the evening of today i.e., 03.04.2025.

The presence of the Medical Superintendent and other officials of Victoria Hospital is noted and their presence in future proceedings is dispensed with.

List the matter on 04.04.2025, at 2.30 p.m.”

4.

Pursuant to the direction of this Court, it transpires that the Victoria Hospital has examined the husband of the petitioner, though there was no order to examine, only to ensure that a report is appropriately generated. The report indicates the problems projected and vindicates the grant of relief that is sought. The prayer sought was transmission of the report to the Chief Medical Officer of the Central Prison. The Chief Medical Officer has confirmed the receipt of the report. Therefore, the main prayer that is sought by the petitioner is met, the grievance is thus redressed. What remains is, the prayer that is sought in the application I.A.No.1 of 2025. The prayer is, owing to the medical condition of the husband of the petitioner, his release on grant of parole.

5.

I have perused the medical records. The medical records indicates that the husband of the petitioner is now stuck with several disorders, all of which cannot be stated in the course of the order. Therefore, the husband of the petitioner becomes entitled to be released on grant of parole. The husband has, as on today, undergone imprisonment for more than 14 years and there is nothing adverse against him and a person who is now stuck with several ailments, cannot indulge in anything dangerous, if he is let off on parole. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to grant the husband of the petitioner general parole for a period of 60 days to become operational from 07.04.2025, with certain conditions.

6.

For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

(i) The Writ Petition is allowed.

(ii) Respondent No.4 is directed to release the husband of the petitioner (CTP No.10803) on general parole for a period of 60 days, commencing from the forenoon of 07.04.2025, till the evening of 05.06.2025.

(iii) The convict (CTP No.10803) shall mark his attendance before the jurisdictional police station, weekly once, throughout the period of his general parole and it would be the responsibility of the jurisdictional police to take him to gaol, in the event, the convict would evade going back to the gaol, after the expiry of the period of parole.

(iv) Respondent No.4 shall stipulate strict conditions as are usually stipulated, to ensure return of the convict to the gaol and that he shall not commit any other offence during the period of parole.

(v) The convict is at liberty to seek extension of parole, which shall be considered looking at the conduct of the convict, while he is out on parole.

(vi) Registry is directed to communicate this order to respondent No.4, by way of electronic mail, forthwith.

Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 also stands disposed.