Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 11 ITAT CK 3744

Anita Tomar vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 25 November 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6455/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 220 words

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2016-17, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080323022(1), dated 03.09.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that there arises the first and foremost issue of validity of the impugned reopening itself since the learned assessing authority had issued section 148 notice to the assessee on 30th March, 2023 i.e after more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year herein AY 2016-17. The Revenue could hardly dispute that going by section 149(1)(b) of the Act, the only exception in clauses (i) to (iii) which has been stipulated by the legislature is in an instance of escaped income which amounts to or likely to Rs. 50 lakhs or more which is not the case in the assessee’s appeal before the tribunal.

3.

Faced with this situation, the tribunal finds merit in the assessee’s instant first and foremost legal ground/argument to quash the impugned reopening as barred by limitation under section 149(1)(b) to reject the Revenue’s vehement contentions in very terms. Ordered accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.