Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 ITAT CK 3227

Anish Ahmad vs ITO, Ward- 1(1)(1)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 27 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member · Amitabh Shukla, Accountant Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.8581/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 192 words

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

This appeal preferred by the assessee against the order dated 18.11.2025 of Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) in DIN & Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082741919(1) arising out of the penalty order dated 16.03.2022 u/s 271AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi for AY: 2018 -19.

2.

On hearing both sides we find that vide ITA No. 7181/Del/2025 for AY: 2018-19 order dated 06.03.2026 a Coordinate Bench has restored the issue to the files of ld. CIT(A) to decide appeal afresh on merits after giving assessee an opportunity of hearing. The present appeal is arising out of penalty proceedings which has foundation in the assessment order and the merits for which are restored by the Coordinate Bench to ld. CIT(A).

3.

In the light of aforesaid the appeal in hand allowed for statistical purposes and the issue on merits as well as law are restored to the files of ld. CIT(A) to give fresh opportunity of hearing and pass order afresh.