High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 08 UK CK 2577

Anirudh Gupta vs State Of Uttarakhand & Ors.

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J · Siddhartha Sah, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 555 OF 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 411 words

(PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)

1.

The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

“I. Issue a writ, order in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 23-11-2024, passed by respondent no.3 in respect of appointment of respondent no.7 as Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering (Contained as Annexure No.6 page no. 49 to this writ petition).

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 to appoint any Professor available in Department of Mechanical Engineering as Head of the Department (as per applicable bye-laws and Administrative decisions) forthwith.”

2.

The case of the petitioner is that in the Institution-respondent No. 4, where he is Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department, apart from him, there is one more Professor, namely, Satyendra Singh, but the Institution has given charge of Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering to respondent No. 6, who is merely Assistant Professor.

3.

The petitioner has placed reliance on Rule 35 of the Society Rules, which reads as follows:-

“Rule 35 HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT:

(1)

Each teaching department or section of the college/Institute shall be placed in the charge of the senior most teacher who shall act as Head of the Department without any additional remuneration.

(2)

The Head of a Department shall be responsible for the entire working of the Department subject to the overall control of the Principal/Director.

(3)

It shall be the duty of the Head of a Department to see that the decisions of the authorities of the College/Institute and the Principal/Director are faithfully carried out. He shall perform such other duties as may be assigned to him by the Principal/Director.”

4.

On the last date of hearing, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Institution sought time to enable the Institution to revisit its decision in respect of appointment of respondent No. 7 as Head of the Department.

5.

Today, when the matter is taken-up, an order passed on 22.08.2026 by the Director of the respondent-Institution has been placed before us for our perusal. By the said order, Professor-Satyendra Singh has been appointed as Head of the Department.

6.

Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that since the second relief stands granted, therefore, the proceedings of the present case may be closed.

7.

Accordingly, the proceedings are closed. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

8.

All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.