High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 03 MP CK 0046

Anil Sawale vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 March 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shailendra Shukla, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6040 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 641 words

This is first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. Applicant â€" Anil Sawale S/o Umrao Sawale is implicated in Crime

No.1077/2019 registered at Police Station â€" Vijay Nagar, District Indore for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 408 of IPC and he is in

custody since 12.11.2019.

As per prosecution story, applicant worked as a Cashier in Sayaji Hotel at Indore in Kebab Ville section. The complainant Sanjay Thakur posted as a

Security & Liasoning Manager in the same hotel made a written complaint along with documents in police station Vijay Nagar, Indore on 04.11.2019,

in which it has been stated that in the audit report, number of irregularities were detected and on questioning, needle of suspicion turned upon the

present applicant and three other accused persons, who were employees in the same hotel namely, Amit Tiwari, Satyaveer Singh and Suman

Choudhary. On questioning them, it was found that they had syphoned off the bill amounts of the hotel and committed breach of trust and the main

protagonist of this conspiracy was the present applicant who on questioning, admitted his involvement. The modus operandi explained by him was that

he, after receiving the cash amount from the customers, would resettle the bill and would adjust the cash bill with other such customers who made

payments through card and he would not generate the bill of such second customers who had made payments through card and the main bill pertaining

to cash would not be generated in respect of the first customer and would not be deposited in the accounts department and that bill, as already

explained, would be resettled in respect of the second customer. The total amount thus syphoned off amounted to more than Rs.21.00 lacs.

On the basis of such written complaint, the investigation process was initiated and charge-sheet under Sections 406 and 408 of IPC has been filed

against the applicant and other co-accused persons.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge-sheet has since been filed, that case is triable by the JMFC, that applicant has deposited more

than Rs.2,00,000/- under protest with the hotel, that he is ready to deposit some more amount, as per his capacity and that he has been falsely

implicated in the alleged offence.

Learned counsel for the applicant has offered to deposit Rs.4,00,000/- before the Trial Court, which shall be his share of mis-appropriation in the case.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the State was also heard who has opposed the bail application.

Considered rival contentions.

After considering the submissions, mainly those advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant to the effect that charge-sheet has been filed, that

case is triable by JMFC and further that the case is not likely to be concluded in very near future, it would be proper to grant bail to the applicant. On

due consideration of the aforesaid circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I allow this bail application and it is directed that

the applicant â€" Anil Sawale shall be released on bail subject to his depositing Rs.4,00,000/-(Rupees Four lacs only) before the Trial Court in the form

of FDR and the certificate shall be in the custody of the Trial Court and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty

thousand only) with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Committal Court for his regular appearance

before the Trial Court/Committal Court on all dates of hearing as may be fixed in this behalf by the Court concerned during trial. It is also directed that

the applicant shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.

M.Cr.C. No.6040/2020 is allowed and stands disposed of Certified copy as per rules.