High CourtsFull Bench(2002) 12 AHC CK 0149

ANIL METAL INDUSTRIES vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 17 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 130 TAXMAN 593

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yatindra Singh, J · M. Katju, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
IT Ref. No. 57 of 1983 17 December 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 193 words

This is an Income Tax reference u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In which the following question has been referred to us for our opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to relief u/s 80J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of borrowed capital having regard to the provisions of section 80J as amended by Finance Act (No. 2) of 1980 ?"

2.

The assessee is a firm and the relevant assessment year is 1979-80, The petitioner filed a return claiming the benefit u/s 80J of the Income Tax Act and the question involved is whether borrowed capital is to be included in the total capital employed by the assessee for getting relief u/s 80J of the Income Tax Act. It has been held in Lohia Machines Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others, that borrowed capital cannot be included in the self-employed capital for getting relief u/s 80J.

3.

In the circumstances of the case the question referred to us is answered in the negative that is in favour of department and against the assessee.