Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 07 NCLT CK 0061

Anil Mangla vs M/s Deviram Restaurants Pvt. Ltd

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 16 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Deepti Mukesh, J · Pradeep R. Sethi, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Petition No. IB-987/ND Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 206 words

SUMMARY OF DUES,

INVOICE NO. AND

DATE","AMOUNT DUE (In

Rs.)

G 17-18/5752 dated

02.01.2018","1,25,118.00

G 17-18/6607 dated

25.01.2018","42,966.00

G 17-18/6852 dated

02.02.2018","1,10,268.00

G 17-18/7786 dated

28.02.2018","38,189.00

G 17-18/7987 dated

05.03.2018","76,335.00

G 17-18/8096 dated

08.03.2018","4,410.00

TOTAL,"3,97,286.00

Less: AMOUNT

RECEIVED","37,549.00

OUTSTANDING

AMOUNT","3,59,737.00

registration no. IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00391/2018-2019/12115 and email address is [email protected] and contact number is 9810234731, as the",

IRP of the Respondent. The IRP is directed to take all such steps as are required under the statute, more specifically in terms of Sections 15,17,18,20",

and 21 of the Code.,

16.

As a consequence of the application being admitted in terms of Section 9(5) of IBC, 2016 moratorium as envisaged under the provisions of Section",

14(1) shall follow in relation to the Respondent prohibiting proviso (a) to (d) of the Code. However, during the pendency of the moratorium period,",

terms of Section 14(2) to 14(3) of the Code shall come in vogue.,

17.

In terms of above order, the Application stands admitted in terms of Section 9(5) of IBC, 2016.",

18.

A copy of the order shall be communicated to the Applicant as well as to the Respondent above named by the Registry. Further the IRP above,

named be also furnished with copy of this order forthwith by the Registry.,