High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 UK CK 0201

Anil Kumar Kakkar vs Dr. J.L. Kaul & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 597 0f 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 168 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This contempt petition was filed on 14.12.2017. As per office report, the contempt petition is barred by limitation.

2.

On 29.12.2017, coordinate Bench of this Court granted ten days' time to remove the defects. More than three years have gone by since filing of this contempt petition.

3.

Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 reads as under:-

"20. Limitation for actions for contempt-No court shall initiate any proceedings of contempt, either on its own motion or otherwise, after the expiry of a period of one year from the date on which the contempt is alleged to have been committed."

4.

Perusal of the aforesaid provision indicates that the Act provides for limitation of one year. Since the order, contempt whereof is alleged, was passed on 11.04.2014 and more than three years, after filing of the contempt petition, notices have not been issued, in such view of the matter, contempt petition is barred by limitation.

5.

Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed.